Logo

Patriots Regret Trading Joe Milton III

Boston, MA – July 4, 2025

The New England Patriots are grappling with a growing sense of regret over their decision to trade quarterback Joe Milton III to the Dallas Cowboys earlier this year, leaving a void in their backup quarterback position that threatens the development and stability of franchise quarterback Drake Maye, sources told ESPN on Friday.

Milton, a sixth-round pick in the 2024 NFL Draft, was traded to Dallas on April 3, 2025, for a fifth-round pick (No. 171) and a seventh-rounder (No. 217), a move that initially seemed strategic to clear cap space and focus on Maye. However, the lack of a suitable backup has since sparked concern within the organization. “We misjudged the depth we needed behind Drake,” an unnamed Patriots official admitted to The Boston Globe. Milton, who appeared in one game for New England in 2024 (Week 18), showed promise with his powerful arm and mobility, throwing for 87 yards in limited action.

Maye, the No. 3 overall pick in 2024, has emerged as the team’s cornerstone, posting 2,276 yards, 15 touchdowns, and 10 interceptions in 12 starts during his rookie season. Yet, his inconsistency—marked by nine fumbles and a concussion in Week 8—highlights the risk of relying solely on him, especially with a shaky offensive line that allowed 42 sacks in 2024, per Pro Football Focus. The current backup, Josh Dobbs, signed to a two-year deal in the offseason, brings 9 years of NFL experience but has struggled as a starter (21-21 record) and lacks the upside to step in seamlessly, recording a 77.3 passer rating in 2023 with Tennessee.

Patriots head coach Mike Vrabel acknowledged the oversight, stating, “Joe gave us a different dimension. Losing him has left us thin.” The trade, executed when the team had $12 million in cap space, now looks premature as Maye’s health remains a concern following a minor ankle sprain in OTAs. GM Eliot Wolf defended the move, noting, “We believed in Drake’s growth,” but analysts question the depth strategy, especially with Dobbs’ 1-2 record in relief appearances last year.

Fans on social media are vocal, with posts like “Milton trade was a mistake!” and “We need a real QB2!” reflecting frustration. As training camp nears on July 23, the Patriots’ lack of a perfect backup could jeopardize their 2025 playoff hopes, particularly against a tough AFC East. Can they address this gap, or will Maye’s burden prove too heavy? Stay tuned to ESPN for updates.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...

CEO of Green Bay Packers Declares Ban on Anyone Wearing Shirts Resembling Tyler Robinson and the Teen Who Defaced Charlie Kirk Memorial
CEO of Green Bay Packers Declares Ban on Anyone Wearing Shirts Resembling Tyler Robinson and the Teen Who Defaced Charlie Kirk Memorial Green Bay — In a bold and controversial move, Green Bay Packers CEO Mark Murphy has announced that any fan wearing shirts resembling those worn by Tyler Robinson, the accused assassin of Charlie Kirk, and the teenager who defaced the Kirk memorial will be banned from entering Lambeau Field. The policy takes effect immediately and will be enforced at all home games. The decision highlights growing concerns over symbolism and security in professional sports. After consultations with stadium officials and organizational leadership, the Packers determined that a proactive stance was necessary. A spokesperson explained the rule as part of the team’s commitment to “protect the fan experience and ensure Lambeau Field remains a safe, inclusive environment for all supporters.” Speaking at a press conference, Murphy emphasized the risk that even subtle details could trigger serious consequences. He stated:“I don’t know if this is some strange coincidence or a darker plot behind it, but I will not allow it inside Lambeau Field. A single detail can bring a major disaster. Something is being spread through that shirt.” The announcement quickly sparked debate throughout the NFL community. Supporters hailed Murphy’s decision as a firm step toward preserving fan safety, while critics expressed concerns about the implications for freedom of expression and the ambiguity of what qualifies as “resembling.” Security analysts suggested the Packers will need to back the policy with consistent enforcement, visible signage, ticketing updates, and training for gate staff. Regardless of the controversy, Murphy’s declaration places Lambeau Field at the heart of a broader national conversation — testing the boundaries between safety, symbolism, and individual rights in one of football’s most iconic venues.