Logo

Former Chiefs Star Free Agent Struggles to Find New Team, Eyes Reunion

KANSAS CITY, Mo. –  A former standout defensive tackle for the Kansas City Chiefs, is facing a challenging free agency period. The Topeka native, who last played for the Chiefs in the 2024 season, has garnered minimal interest from NFL teams and is now hoping for a return to Arrowhead Stadium, sources told The Athletic on Thursday.

Pennel, 34, was a key rotational player for the Chiefs from 2019-2020 and again from 2023-2024, appearing in 39 games with 82 tackles, four sacks, and a forced fumble across his stints. A fan favorite for his run-stuffing prowess, he earned a career-high three sacks in 2024 and played a pivotal role in Kansas City’s Super Bowl LVIII victory, logging six tackles against the San Francisco 49ers. Despite his contributions, Pennel’s one-year, $1.42 million deal expired, leaving him as an unrestricted free agent.

“Kansas City is my heart,” Pennel told reporters. “I’d love to finish what I started with Coach Reid and the guys.”

The 6-foot-4, 330-pound lineman’s market has been quiet, with teams like the Pittsburgh Steelers and Philadelphia Eagles passing on the veteran. His age and limited pass-rush upside—never exceeding 35 tackles in a season—have cooled interest, despite his proven run-defense skills. In 2024, Pennel ranked 13th among interior linemen with at least 150 run-defense snaps, per Pro Football Focus, but his 320 defensive snaps were a career low for a full season.

Pennel’s peak came in 2019, when he joined the Chiefs midseason and transformed their run defense, helping secure Super Bowl LIV. His emotional pre-game speech before the game endeared him to fans. However, his 2024 campaign was marred by a hamstring injury during a Christmas Day win over Pittsburgh, limiting his late-season impact.

The Chiefs, with $38 million in cap space, could consider a reunion. Their defensive line, anchored by Chris Jones, lacks depth with Derrick Nnadi and Tershawn Wharton also free agents. Pennel’s familiarity with Steve Spagnuolo’s system and his chemistry with Jones—“Being on the field with him makes my job easier,” he once said—could make a low-cost deal appealing.

Fans are split. “Pennel’s a warrior—bring him back!” one posted on X. Another argued, “He’s slowing down. We need young blood like Fabien Lovett.” The Chiefs’ recent draft pick, Omarr Norman-Lott, signals a youth movement, potentially sidelining veterans like Pennel.

“I’ve still got gas in the tank,” Pennel insisted.

A return isn’t guaranteed. Kansas City’s focus on younger talent, like undrafted rookie Fabien Lovett Sr., may outweigh Pennel’s experience. His roots in Topeka and two Super Bowl rings keep his hopes alive, but will the Chiefs roll out the red carpet?

 

0 views
Kirk’s Wife Rejects $1.15M  - Calls for Funds to Support Struggling Communities
Kirk’s Wife Rejects $1.15M — Calls for Funds to Support Struggling Communities The emotional aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination has taken another dramatic turn. After Tyler Robinson’s father pledged to donate the $1.15 million reward to Kirk’s family, Kirk’s wife firmly rejected the offer. Her decision was accompanied by a deeply moving statement:"What Charlie left us is not a lack of money, but a lack of love, the absence of a husband, the absence of a father. If Charlie cannot be returned to us, then let this money go to help those in need in his place. Let his spirit continue to support the lives of the less fortunate." Her words have reframed the national narrative. What was once seen as redemption through financial compensation has now been shifted toward community healing, echoing Charlie’s lifelong mission: to sacrifice personal comfort in service of a greater good. Tyler Robinson’s father had already stunned the nation by turning in his own son. His follow-up pledge to donate the million-dollar reward was hailed as courageous, with many calling it an extraordinary attempt at reconciliation. Yet Kirk’s wife’s refusal drew equal attention, transforming the conversation. By rejecting the money, she highlighted mental health and community aid as urgent national priorities—areas in desperate need of resources to prevent future tragedies like Charlie’s death. Supporters across social media reacted with admiration. Many described her stance as morally uncompromising, a rare example of principle over profit. Others said the moment felt like a continuation of Charlie Kirk’s values in action. Billionaire Bill Ackman, who boosted the reward pool to $1 million, confirmed his commitment to honor the payout. The question now is whether legal and logistical steps can redirect the funds into meaningful programs that serve the vulnerable. For many Americans, this chapter will be remembered not only for a father’s painful accountability but also for a wife’s call to transform grief into healing. It ensures Charlie Kirk’s name remains tied to hope, not only tragedy.