Logo

Football fan alleges discrimination, collusion in NFL draft against Shedeur Sanders: Lawsuit

Atlanta, GA – May 2025 — The NFL is facing a $100 million lawsuit from a football fan who alleges that the league conspired to damage quarterback Shedeur Sanders’ draft position, causing him “severe emotional distress,” according to court documents obtained by ABC News.

The suit, filed in federal court in Atlanta by an anonymous individual identified only as “John Doe,” claims that NFL teams intentionally collaborated to push Sanders into a lower draft round—a move the plaintiff argues violates antitrust, civil rights, and consumer protection laws.

Sanders, a standout quarterback from Colorado, was projected to be a top-five pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, with ESPN’s Mel Kiper Jr. ranking him as the second-best QB available. Sanders had an impressive 2024 season, completing 353 of 477 passes (74%) and leading the Buffaloes to their first nine-win season since 2014.

But expectations collapsed on draft weekend when Sanders fell to the fifth round, eventually selected 144th overall by the Cleveland Browns—a team that passed on him six times and even drafted Oregon’s Dillon Gabriel in the third round, despite Kiper ranking Gabriel just eighth among quarterbacks.

The surprise slide became one of the biggest storylines of draft weekend, drawing record viewership on Day 3. But for the fan behind the lawsuit, the experience was traumatic.

“The NFL’s actions and the spread of harmful statements about Sanders have caused me severe emotional distress and trauma,” Doe wrote in the lawsuit.

According to the filing, Doe is a Georgia resident and long-time Colorado football fan who attended the Buffaloes’ 2023 game vs. TCU—Sanders' debut, where he threw for 510 yards and four touchdowns in a 45-42 win.

The lawsuit alleges that negative reports about Sanders’ pre-draft interviews unfairly damaged his image and cost him millions in potential earnings. It accuses the NFL of:

  1. Violating the Sherman Antitrust Act by suggesting teams coordinated to suppress Sanders’ draft value.

  • Violating the Civil Rights Act by implying racial bias may have played a role in his drop.

  • Violating consumer protection laws by misleading fans about the fairness and transparency of the draft process.

  • As of now, the NFL has not issued a public response to the legal action.

    This lawsuit adds yet another twist to the dramatic draft fall of Shedeur Sanders, who remains one of the most discussed players of the 2025 class—both for his on-field potential and the off-field controversy now surrounding his selection.

    CEO of Buffalo Bills Declares Ban on Anyone Wearing Shirts Resembling Tyler Robinson and the Teen Who Defaced Charlie Kirk Memorial
    CEO of Buffalo Bills Declares Ban on Anyone Wearing Shirts Resembling Tyler Robinson and the Teen Who Defaced Charlie Kirk Memorial Buffalo — In a bold and controversial decision, Buffalo Bills CEO Terry Pegula has announced that any fan wearing shirts resembling those worn by Tyler Robinson, the accused assassin of Charlie Kirk, and the teenager who defaced the Kirk memorial will be banned from entering Highmark Stadium. The rule takes effect immediately and will be enforced at all home games. The decision reflects heightened concerns about symbolism and security in professional sports. After consultations with stadium authorities and team leadership, the Bills concluded that stronger preventive steps were necessary. A spokesperson explained the move as a way to “protect the fan experience and ensure Highmark Stadium remains a safe, inclusive place for all supporters.” At a press conference, Pegula stressed that even the smallest details could spiral into larger problems. He declared:“I don’t know if this is some strange coincidence or a darker plot behind it, but I will not allow it inside Highmark Stadium. A single detail can bring a major disaster. Something is being spread through that shirt.” The announcement sent ripples across the NFL community. Supporters commended Pegula’s decisive leadership, calling it a proactive step to protect fans. Critics, however, argued that banning apparel based on resemblance could create confusion and fuel debates over free expression. Security experts pointed out that the Bills will need transparent enforcement protocols, including visible signage, updated ticketing terms, and proper staff training to avoid inconsistent application. No matter where the public lands on the issue, Pegula’s decree ensures that Highmark Stadium is now at the center of a wider national conversation — where the balance between safety, symbolism, and personal freedom will be tested under the bright lights of one of the NFL’s most passionate fan bases.